Whoop 5.0 charges monthly for dedicated recovery tracking with new SpO2 and temperature sensors; Fitbit offers affordable hardware with optional Premium subscription. Different price models and feature focuses for different users.
Comparison Overview
| Category | Whoop 5.0 | Fitbit Sense 2 / Charge 6 |
|---|---|---|
| HRV Analysis | Deep recovery insights, strain correlation ✓ | Basic HRV, Readiness Score (Premium) |
| Whoop's HRV analysis is more sophisticated | ||
| Recovery Focus | Primary purpose—detailed recovery metrics ✓ | One feature among many |
| Whoop is built around recovery | ||
| Sleep Tracking | Excellent with sleep coach ✓ | Good with Premium insights |
| Whoop's sleep features are deeper | ||
| Activity Tracking | Strain from HR only, no GPS | Steps, workouts, GPS (select models) ✓ |
| Fitbit better for general fitness | ||
| Display | No screen | Screen with stats and notifications ✓ |
| Fitbit shows real-time data | ||
| Price (3 years) | $1,080 subscription | $200-600 device + $360 Premium ✓ |
| Fitbit is cheaper long-term | ||
| Target User | Serious athletes, recovery-focused | General fitness enthusiasts |
| Different audiences | ||
The Bottom Line
Choose Whoop if recovery optimization and training load are your primary focus and you want detailed insights without needing a screen. Choose Fitbit if you want affordable all-day activity tracking with basic HRV features and prefer having a visible display.
Detailed Reviews
Whoop 5.0
Best for serious athletes who want completely passive tracking and don't mind paying monthly. The training load and...
Full reviewFitbit Sense 2 / Charge 6
Good for general fitness users who want HRV as part of broader health tracking. The Premium subscription unlocks the...
Full review